The "10 dimensions" (levels of Self-Awareness) are:
1. Quarks
2. Subatomic
3. Atomic
4. Molecular
5. Cellular
6. Species (body)
7. Planetary
8. Solar
9. Galactic
10. Universal
The human species has unfortunately been diverted from the natural evolution into a higher level of Self-Awareness, which is planetary consciousness. Those humans who remain focused primarily on the realm of the 5 senses rather than the 2D digital realm (which dilutes and distracts attention on the sensual realm by including thought) will evolve to a planetary consciousness. Those humans who are focused primarily on the digital realm and technology will DEVOLVE into accepting that a simulation within a simulation, to be the new "reality".
Rupert, I have been binging of your work over the last few days and I can't see any place where our respective theories/world views are in disagreement. I agree with everything you say about science being based upon beliefs just as much as religion is. In fact I see very clearly how and even where, all of science is exactly the path that leads to a deepening of delusion/Maya.
I am presenting the exact paradigm shift required at the end (Kali Yuga/Armageddon). The final concluding Truth REVEALS THAT WHICH IS FALSE. As it turns out, ALL OF MATHEMATICS, from the invention of "quantity" onward, is IN ERROR.
I'm certain you will SEE what so many others have been incapable of seeing.
It seems like a perfect fit that you would be the one to break this most important revelation in history to humanity. I hope so.
Hi Rupert, if you haven't you might look into the work of Jacob Baranades' regarding quantum mechanics – specifically his indivisible stochastic process interpretation. This interpretation shows that the existing formulations of quantum mechanics can be *mathematically derived* from the assumption that the motions of quantum particles are indivisible stochastic processes. What does that mean? It means the motions of a particle over some fixed duration provide zero constraint upon what the particle might do next. This is intuitively obvious – for the ball point of a ball point pen is a particle (in any case, it contains quarks and electrons and so forth) and no matter how much one writes or draws or scribbles, the prior motions over some fixed duration are inadequate to deduce the subsequent motion.
This does not mean that the cosmos doesn't display regularity (or even that there aren't transcendent laws). Because it's entirely clear that the prior motions of a particle do say something about future motions (and, of course, the indivisible stochastic process interpretation doesn't preclude this). For example, when reading poetry or viewing a movie, one has some sensibility about what may come next. When this sensibility is entirely flouted ("and then they woke up and it was all just a dream"), we rightly feel shortchanged because the what-comes-next turned out to be influenced by some motive extrinsic to the artwork – which is not how the cosmos itself behaves.
Therefore if we could perhaps know all things entirely and beyond, then we would surely see that these regularities become necessities (like some phrase in a beautiful symphony is a kind of necessity). The problem is that our knowledge is limited – for if we had perfect self-knowledge then surely we wouldn't exist.
Also I think it's important to reflect on the fact that "particle" means nothing more than "a little part of reality". My feeling is that our conceptions of "particles" within the cosmos converge upon monads and the supreme-monad – in the same way that our conceptions of numerical intervals within the real number line converge upon infinitesimals and the notion of the infinite (the infinite not being the real number line itself but that which transcends it – and makes its conception possible).
I am writing to describe a strange telepathic phenomenon I have encountered. For reasons unknown, individuals around me—after prolonged proximity—begin to involuntarily experience a paranormal connection. Random people (subjects) are forced, uncontrollably (for both them and me), to perceive my mental activities. This includes my subjective will, memories, associative thoughts, intrusive thoughts, emotions, and nearly all aspects of my mental and emotional processes. I have no intention of allowing others to access my thoughts, and the subjects themselves do not wish to know my mental content, as it disrupts their daily work and lives by flooding their minds with my inner world. Meanwhile, I have lost all privacy and must constantly monitor my thoughts to avoid offending or disturbing others—a responsibility I acknowledge.
Notably, when I sleep, the phenomenon appears to weaken due to reduced mental activity, sparing subjects from being kept awake by a "noisy" mental presence. However, if I wake during the night, my reactivated thoughts risk disturbing those already asleep. Paradoxically, my anxiety about disrupting their rest often leads to insomnia, which in turn may keep them awake.
Crucially, this telepathy is strikingly precise. Subjects perceive my thoughts, actions, and even subconscious mental content with unsettling clarity—far beyond typical vague or ambiguous telepathic accounts. For instance, when viewing a set of randomly generated numbers in a controlled setting (without phones or surveillance), one or multiple subjects consistently identify the numbers with 100% accuracy,which supports the phenomenon’s validity for rigorous study.
Both the affected individuals and I urgently hope to collaborate on research to eliminate this connection and return restore normalcy. If you are open to conducting experiments, I would be deeply grateful for your prompt reply.
The laws of nature emerge from the coherent phase dynamics of a universal memory field, where past states leave persistent imprints. Memory is the lasting influence of these states; inertia is the field’s resistance to change, enabling stable patterns and structures to form. Physical laws arise as condensed habits—regularities shaped by the self-organization of memory.
For a thing to be predictable it must conform to a pattern (a known pattern). In reproduction random events do occur, such as disease or genetic abnormalities. These events are not the expected, but are not a mystery within our present understanding of DNA. These are mutable rules, the anomalies of such are not mysterious. These anomalies are not the majority of outcomes in m/f reproduction whether biological or botanical. Are not these predictabilities therefore causal and mutable over time. Darwin ‘works’ because of mutable adaptations to an underlying structural ‘rules’. I think the word ‘Rules’ is unfortunate and is the element which needs defining before this argument can go anywhere.
There are no fundamental constants and hence no fine tuning of the universe is necessary. Most fundamental constants come from the need to translate between the different ‘stuffs’ and energies of contemporary physics. Once these are reduced to a single set of equations, the problem disappears:
The basic field equations are fixed but evolution happens at the top level layer and is driven by cognitive feedback, just as the rules of chess are fixed but each game develops in a unique way:
"The Return of the God Hypothesis" by Stephen C Meyer, a highly reasoned scientific hypothesis regarding Intelligent Design. Hic conclusion, that the combined chances of everything needed for the Universe and life are SO ridiculously high that only intelligent design can account for us being here. Worth a read, whether or not you think this to be a possibility
Remember - we are witness to three miracles every day - all of us, believers, agnostics and atheists.
1. Something came from nothing
2. Life. We may think us super advanced, but we still cannot make a simple cell
3. Consciousness. We have no idea what it is, how it operates, or how it arose.
Those are all miracles, that science is nowhere near to explaining. And never will.
This resolves the question: “Is mathematics discovered or invented?” This resolution reveals that the entire concept of “quantity” IS IN ERROR! It also reveals that the natural number system is a message implanted within consciousness by the creator to help assist us out of the delusion we are in.
I know you guys don’t have a problem with this language/theory. Please take this seriously. Let’s talk.
In regards to "Is the sun conscious?"
https://youtu.be/souOtoPpP7g?si=V07nwL0XUWdg6s9v&t=205
The "10 dimensions" (levels of Self-Awareness) are:
1. Quarks
2. Subatomic
3. Atomic
4. Molecular
5. Cellular
6. Species (body)
7. Planetary
8. Solar
9. Galactic
10. Universal
The human species has unfortunately been diverted from the natural evolution into a higher level of Self-Awareness, which is planetary consciousness. Those humans who remain focused primarily on the realm of the 5 senses rather than the 2D digital realm (which dilutes and distracts attention on the sensual realm by including thought) will evolve to a planetary consciousness. Those humans who are focused primarily on the digital realm and technology will DEVOLVE into accepting that a simulation within a simulation, to be the new "reality".
Rupert, I have been binging of your work over the last few days and I can't see any place where our respective theories/world views are in disagreement. I agree with everything you say about science being based upon beliefs just as much as religion is. In fact I see very clearly how and even where, all of science is exactly the path that leads to a deepening of delusion/Maya.
I am presenting the exact paradigm shift required at the end (Kali Yuga/Armageddon). The final concluding Truth REVEALS THAT WHICH IS FALSE. As it turns out, ALL OF MATHEMATICS, from the invention of "quantity" onward, is IN ERROR.
I'm certain you will SEE what so many others have been incapable of seeing.
It seems like a perfect fit that you would be the one to break this most important revelation in history to humanity. I hope so.
Hi Rupert, if you haven't you might look into the work of Jacob Baranades' regarding quantum mechanics – specifically his indivisible stochastic process interpretation. This interpretation shows that the existing formulations of quantum mechanics can be *mathematically derived* from the assumption that the motions of quantum particles are indivisible stochastic processes. What does that mean? It means the motions of a particle over some fixed duration provide zero constraint upon what the particle might do next. This is intuitively obvious – for the ball point of a ball point pen is a particle (in any case, it contains quarks and electrons and so forth) and no matter how much one writes or draws or scribbles, the prior motions over some fixed duration are inadequate to deduce the subsequent motion.
This does not mean that the cosmos doesn't display regularity (or even that there aren't transcendent laws). Because it's entirely clear that the prior motions of a particle do say something about future motions (and, of course, the indivisible stochastic process interpretation doesn't preclude this). For example, when reading poetry or viewing a movie, one has some sensibility about what may come next. When this sensibility is entirely flouted ("and then they woke up and it was all just a dream"), we rightly feel shortchanged because the what-comes-next turned out to be influenced by some motive extrinsic to the artwork – which is not how the cosmos itself behaves.
Therefore if we could perhaps know all things entirely and beyond, then we would surely see that these regularities become necessities (like some phrase in a beautiful symphony is a kind of necessity). The problem is that our knowledge is limited – for if we had perfect self-knowledge then surely we wouldn't exist.
Also I think it's important to reflect on the fact that "particle" means nothing more than "a little part of reality". My feeling is that our conceptions of "particles" within the cosmos converge upon monads and the supreme-monad – in the same way that our conceptions of numerical intervals within the real number line converge upon infinitesimals and the notion of the infinite (the infinite not being the real number line itself but that which transcends it – and makes its conception possible).
Dear Dr. Rupert Sheldrake,
I am writing to describe a strange telepathic phenomenon I have encountered. For reasons unknown, individuals around me—after prolonged proximity—begin to involuntarily experience a paranormal connection. Random people (subjects) are forced, uncontrollably (for both them and me), to perceive my mental activities. This includes my subjective will, memories, associative thoughts, intrusive thoughts, emotions, and nearly all aspects of my mental and emotional processes. I have no intention of allowing others to access my thoughts, and the subjects themselves do not wish to know my mental content, as it disrupts their daily work and lives by flooding their minds with my inner world. Meanwhile, I have lost all privacy and must constantly monitor my thoughts to avoid offending or disturbing others—a responsibility I acknowledge.
Notably, when I sleep, the phenomenon appears to weaken due to reduced mental activity, sparing subjects from being kept awake by a "noisy" mental presence. However, if I wake during the night, my reactivated thoughts risk disturbing those already asleep. Paradoxically, my anxiety about disrupting their rest often leads to insomnia, which in turn may keep them awake.
Crucially, this telepathy is strikingly precise. Subjects perceive my thoughts, actions, and even subconscious mental content with unsettling clarity—far beyond typical vague or ambiguous telepathic accounts. For instance, when viewing a set of randomly generated numbers in a controlled setting (without phones or surveillance), one or multiple subjects consistently identify the numbers with 100% accuracy,which supports the phenomenon’s validity for rigorous study.
Both the affected individuals and I urgently hope to collaborate on research to eliminate this connection and return restore normalcy. If you are open to conducting experiments, I would be deeply grateful for your prompt reply.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Chenny
The laws of nature emerge from the coherent phase dynamics of a universal memory field, where past states leave persistent imprints. Memory is the lasting influence of these states; inertia is the field’s resistance to change, enabling stable patterns and structures to form. Physical laws arise as condensed habits—regularities shaped by the self-organization of memory.
For a thing to be predictable it must conform to a pattern (a known pattern). In reproduction random events do occur, such as disease or genetic abnormalities. These events are not the expected, but are not a mystery within our present understanding of DNA. These are mutable rules, the anomalies of such are not mysterious. These anomalies are not the majority of outcomes in m/f reproduction whether biological or botanical. Are not these predictabilities therefore causal and mutable over time. Darwin ‘works’ because of mutable adaptations to an underlying structural ‘rules’. I think the word ‘Rules’ is unfortunate and is the element which needs defining before this argument can go anywhere.
There are no fundamental constants and hence no fine tuning of the universe is necessary. Most fundamental constants come from the need to translate between the different ‘stuffs’ and energies of contemporary physics. Once these are reduced to a single set of equations, the problem disappears:
https://library-of-atlantis.com/2025/06/05/there-is-no-fine-tuning-of-the-universe/
The basic field equations are fixed but evolution happens at the top level layer and is driven by cognitive feedback, just as the rules of chess are fixed but each game develops in a unique way:
https://library-of-atlantis.com/2025/02/27/evolution-and-cognition/
Suggested reading
"The Return of the God Hypothesis" by Stephen C Meyer, a highly reasoned scientific hypothesis regarding Intelligent Design. Hic conclusion, that the combined chances of everything needed for the Universe and life are SO ridiculously high that only intelligent design can account for us being here. Worth a read, whether or not you think this to be a possibility
Remember - we are witness to three miracles every day - all of us, believers, agnostics and atheists.
1. Something came from nothing
2. Life. We may think us super advanced, but we still cannot make a simple cell
3. Consciousness. We have no idea what it is, how it operates, or how it arose.
Those are all miracles, that science is nowhere near to explaining. And never will.
I have personally experienced what Sheldrake posits and sm very grateful to have a way to explain it.
The Second Coming isn't a person, it is the holyghost. And it has arrived in the form of message.
And it has arrived carrying a sword.
This resolves the question: “Is mathematics discovered or invented?” This resolution reveals that the entire concept of “quantity” IS IN ERROR! It also reveals that the natural number system is a message implanted within consciousness by the creator to help assist us out of the delusion we are in.
I know you guys don’t have a problem with this language/theory. Please take this seriously. Let’s talk.
https://youtu.be/xnwklLGHFJ0?si=g2GXtKXInI9k3QS5&t=429